Monthly Archives: June 2023

The Business of the Supreme Court Law Clerks

Tracy E. George, Albert Yoon, & Mitu Gulati, Some are More Equal Than Others: U.S. Supreme Court Clerkships, Univ. of Va. Pub. L. & Legal Theory Rsch. Paper Series 2023-10, available at SSRN (Feb. 23, 2023).

Have you ever wondered how Supreme Court Justices came to have law clerks? (Are you wondering it now?) That story begins in 1882, when Justice Horace Gray joined the Court from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and brought with him a “legal secretary” to serve for one year. While Justice Gray originally paid out of pocket for his assistance, Congress began funding the position in 1886 (with a salary of $1,600 per year!). By the 1970s, Congress had increased the complement of clerks to four—a number that has remained constant. What has also remained constant is how desirable these positions are, with past clerks going on to top positions in the academy, bar, and the judiciary itself. (Of the current members of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kagan, Justice Gorsuch, Justice Kavanaugh, Justice Barrett, and Justice Jackson all served as law clerks).

Given how valuable these positions are, one may wonder who else has filled them. Where did they attend law school, and college before that? For whom did they clerk? Which of these factors seemed most relevant in ultimately being chosen to clerk on the Court? What occupations did they pursue following their time on First Street and how critical was the clerkship for their later success? (Again, if you were not wondering about these questions before, are you wondering now?). For as much as has been written about the Court and its Justices, little could be called a comprehensive analysis of the “world of Court clerks as an institution.” Enter court scholars Tracey E. George, Albert Yoon, and Mitu Gulati, with their insightful new article on the subject. Continue reading "The Business of the Supreme Court Law Clerks"

Excluding Animals: A Rule of Law Violation

John Adenitire, The Rule of Law for All Sentient Animals, 35 Can. J.L. & Juris. 1 (2022).

Those wanting to brush up on “the rule of law,” recall the differences amongst leading rule of law theorists, or consider the equality implications of classic definitions of what the rule of law is and is said to protect, need only consult John Adenitire’s The Rule of Law for All Sentient Animals published last year in the Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence. In it, Adenitire argues that prevailing accounts of the rule of law are exclusionary of beings with “lesser” rational capacities (both human and nonhuman), and he charts a more inclusive path. Through these contributions, Adenitire also convinces his reader as to the need for any rule of law theory to explicitly protect animals.

In a single article, Adenitire concisely illuminates key rule of law theories—formal, procedural, substantive—through focusing on their exposition by influential proponents. Adenitire takes Lon Fuller, Jeremy Waldron, and T.R.S. Allan as illustrative theorists of the formal, procedural, and substantive iterations respectively. Adenitire’s intent is to show how each excludes animals from their purview by privileging what he terms “active legal subjects” (P. 1), understood as those able to apprehend and adhere to the law and those who can be sanctioned for any violations. Continue reading "Excluding Animals: A Rule of Law Violation"